The Free Dictionary  
mailing list For webmasters
Welcome Guest Forum Search | Active Topics | Members

defining relative clause or non defining Options
Tara2
Posted: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 7:16:22 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 11/8/2017
Posts: 1,802
Neurons: 7,192
How should this be a defining clause? How does "who had committed criminal offences" add information to the sentence?



The police arrested three youngsters who had committed criminal offences.
Drag0nspeaker
Posted: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 10:13:03 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 9/12/2011
Posts: 33,914
Neurons: 219,510
Location: Livingston, Scotland, United Kingdom
I would guess that the police went out to arrest specifically "people who had committed offences".
They don't go round randomly arresting teenagers (not often anyway!)

It's not an irrelevant parenthetic bit of data.
It doesn't really make sense like this:
The police arrested three youngsters (who, by an odd coincidence, had committed crimes).

I'd say it was a restrictive clause.
Tara2
Posted: Tuesday, March 24, 2020 10:40:03 AM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 11/8/2017
Posts: 1,802
Neurons: 7,192
Drag0nspeaker wrote:
I would guess that the police went out to arrest specifically "people who had committed offences".
They don't go round randomly arresting teenagers (not often anyway!)

It's not an irrelevant parenthetic bit of data.
It doesn't really make sense like this:
The police arrested three youngsters (who, by an odd coincidence, had committed crimes).

I'd say it was a restrictive clause.

Many thanks Drago!
But isn't it redundant? Since it's very clear that those three youngsters committed offences, it's redundant and the clause is non-definig, no?
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.