|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 3/7/2009 Posts: 6,888 Points: 19,932 Location: Inside Farlex computers
|
 The declaration that our People are hostile to a government made by themselves, for themselves, and conducted by themselves, is an insult. John Quincy Adams (1767-1848)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 1/17/2010 Posts: 78 Points: 234
|
Woul our President say the same today?
Israelite, calling all Galuts of Yah.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 9/10/2009 Posts: 403 Points: 1,209 Location: United States
|
Most political quotes will surely polarize the forum. Personally, I believe today's U.S. government is made by money, for money, and conducted by money. I wouldn't say I'm hostile toward it, but I'm definitely wary of it. It's because I'm not particularyly represented anymore. It's more like I'm managed and manipulated.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 1/17/2010 Posts: 78 Points: 234
|
The balance of power in a society accompanies the balance of property in land.
I agree with you that in politics the middle way is none at all.
While all other sciences advanced, that of government is at a standstill-little better practiced now than three or four thousand years ago.
As much as I converse with the sages and heroes, they have very little of my love and admiration. I long for rural and domestic scenes, for the warbling of birds and the prattling of my children.
Did you ever see a portrait of a great man without perceiving strong traits of pain and anxiety.
When annual elections end, there slavery begins.
-John Adams
[Journalists] are a sort of assassins who sit with loaded blunderbusses at the corners of streets and fire them off for hire or for sport at any passengers they select.
All that I am my mother made me.
-John Quincy Adams
Israelite, calling all Galuts of Yah.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 4/27/2009 Posts: 140 Points: 404 Location: United States
|
Hupomone wrote:Most political quotes will surely polarize the forum. Personally, I believe today's U.S. government is made by money, for money, and conducted by money. I wouldn't say I'm hostile toward it, but I'm definitely wary of it. It's because I'm not particularyly represented anymore. It's more like I'm managed and manipulated. I second that! Also, given the evidence of Wall Street, the BP disaster in the Gulf, and the insurance crisis, the evidence is clear that we need some kind of regulation of campaign $$$ going to politicians. Only the truly ignorant or blind would say that the amount of money pouring into Washington does not affect policy or pose a direct threat to our country. I would like to see politicians responding to the "will of the voters" rather than the "will of the money-holders", as Mr. Adams so reverently defended.
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.” -- Chinese proverb
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/2/2009 Posts: 2,841 Points: 8,625 Location: United States, Pacific Northwest
|
Quote:In 1798, President John Adams pushed throught Congress the Alien and Sedition Acts, which empowered Adams to suppress free speech and imprison without trial any critic of the federal government. When the citizens of Westmoreland County, Virginia petitioned Adams in 1798 complaining of the acts, President Adams responded by denouncing the citizents: “The declaration that Our People are hostile to a government made by themselves, for themselves, and conducted by themselves, is an insult.” Adam’s (sic) response to the people of Westmoreland County – few of whom had voted for Adams – was the classic trick of a would-be democratic tyrant: declaiming to people that they were obliged to submit to opression because the chief executive had been duly elected by other voters.
From “Freedom in Chains” by James Bovard
Google Books: Freedom in Chains
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 11/22/2009 Posts: 1,616 Points: 4,897 Location: New Mexico, United States
|
Thanks for giving us some context to this quote RuthP. I have always felt that it is our duty to look at the actions our elected officials take with clear eyes. Even when the elected official received my vote before taking office, no one gets a free pass to behave as they wish without consequences. It is not an “insult”; it is my obligation as a citizen. And the term "hostile" is very subjective.
"He who never made a mistake never made a discovery." Samuel Smiles
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/2/2009 Posts: 2,841 Points: 8,625 Location: United States, Pacific Northwest
|
I agree, Mary. At my age, I've become used to the fact that I will have some degree of difference even with those for whom I vote.
I have some sympathy for Adams in this. Our "freedom of speech" was an extremely new concept and I rather suspect that those who voted for it had differing ideas about what it meant. I, with 200+ years of freedom of speech in my country, have no patience with the idea that the government should be protected from criticism. I would, however, like to see criticisms supported by facts and name-calling eschewed (by both sides, "theirs" and mine).
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 4/27/2009 Posts: 140 Points: 404 Location: United States
|
RuthP wrote:Quote:In 1798, President John Adams pushed throught Congress the Alien and Sedition Acts, which empowered Adams to suppress free speech and imprison without trial any critic of the federal government. When the citizens of Westmoreland County, Virginia petitioned Adams in 1798 complaining of the acts, President Adams responded by denouncing the citizents: “The declaration that Our People are hostile to a government made by themselves, for themselves, and conducted by themselves, is an insult.” Adam’s (sic) response to the people of Westmoreland County – few of whom had voted for Adams – was the classic trick of a would-be democratic tyrant: declaiming to people that they were obliged to submit to opression because the chief executive had been duly elected by other voters.
From “Freedom in Chains” by James Bovard
Google Books: Freedom in Chains It's amazing what an 11 year old president of the US was able to accomplish! I don't know where you got that quote RuthP but you got the wrong president, the quote is from John QUINCY Adams, not his father John Adams, who passed the Alien and Sedition Acts.
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.” -- Chinese proverb
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 4/27/2009 Posts: 140 Points: 404 Location: United States
|
Sorry, I did my math wrong, J.Q. Adams was 31 in 1798. Still too young to be president by 4 years. Damn you FreeDictionary for not letting me edit my posts!
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.” -- Chinese proverb
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 4/3/2009 Posts: 2,930 Points: 8,683 Location: Michigan, United States
|
nw3bk3y wrote:Hupomone wrote:Most political quotes will surely polarize the forum. Personally, I believe today's U.S. government is made by money, for money, and conducted by money. I wouldn't say I'm hostile toward it, but I'm definitely wary of it. It's because I'm not particularyly represented anymore. It's more like I'm managed and manipulated. I second that! Also, given the evidence of Wall Street, the BP disaster in the Gulf, and the insurance crisis, the evidence is clear that we need some kind of regulation of campaign $$$ going to politicians. Only the truly ignorant or blind would say that the amount of money pouring into Washington does not affect policy or pose a direct threat to our country. I would like to see politicians responding to the "will of the voters" rather than the "will of the money-holders", as Mr. Adams so reverently defended. I third that!
I am carrying my heart~I am carrying my rhythm~I am carrying my prayers~But you can't kill my spirit~It's soaring and strong (Paula Cole's Me Lyrics)***We are not human beings having a spiritual experience. We ARE spirtual beings having a human experience.(T.deChardin)***There are only two ways to live your life. One is as though nothing is a miracle. The other is as though everything is a miracle. (Albert Einstein)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 1/20/2010 Posts: 1,348 Points: 3,889 Location: CANADA - Toronto
|
We the people not "them", we the people are responsible for all of our
government. What is going on in Texas where "they" seem to be rewriting History
especially derogatory comments about Jefferson, who I hope to read in entirely,
later this year. Also white washing slavery! ??????????????????????????
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,098 Points: 9,315 Location: United States
|
RuthP wrote:I agree, Mary. At my age, I've become used to the fact that I will have some degree of difference even with those for whom I vote.
I have some sympathy for Adams in this. Our "freedom of speech" was an extremely new concept and I rather suspect that those who voted for it had differing ideas about what it meant. I, with 200+ years of freedom of speech in my country, have no patience with the idea that the government should be protected from criticism. I would, however, like to see criticisms supported by facts and name-calling eschewed (by both sides, "theirs" and mine). That is a realistic approach. Also, an informed electorate is the guardian of democracy. That vigilance is not promoted by seeking only those opinions that mesh with one's own preconceived notions. If you aren't knowlegeable, any wily politician can lead you by the nose with lies.
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,098 Points: 9,315 Location: United States
|
Ellenrita wrote:We the people not "them", we the people are responsible for all of our
government. What is going on in Texas where "they" seem to be rewriting History
especially derogatory comments about Jefferson, who I hope to read in entirely,
later this year. Also white washing slavery! ?????????????????????????? Don't get me going on Texas. It's the one state in the Confederacy that should have been allowed to leave the Union. That re-write of the textbooks is being spearheaded by a dentist. Clearly, a lifetime of filling cavities has more than prepared the man for re-writing our kid's textbooks. Your post ties in nicely with what I said above. The man isn't a historian, but, he fosters and perpetuates a narrow (and largely fanciful) view of history. If this goes forward, we will be giving our kids a bloodless lobotomy.
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/27/2009 Posts: 630 Points: 1,828 Location: United States
|
[quote=RuthP][quote]In 1798, President John Adams pushed throught Congress the Alien and Sedition Acts, which empowered Adams to suppress free speech and imprison without trial any critic of the federal government. When the citizens of Westmoreland County, Virginia petitioned Adams in 1798 complaining of the acts, President Adams responded by denouncing the citizents: “The declaration that Our People are hostile to a government made by themselves, for themselves, and conducted by themselves, is an insult.” Adam’s (sic) response to the people of Westmoreland County – few of whom had voted for Adams – was the classic trick of a would-be democratic tyrant: declaiming to people that they were obliged to submit to opression because the chief executive had been duly elected by other voters.
quote]
Excellent quote. And it sounds EXACTLY like the rhetoric of our present President.
"The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program." - Ronald Reagan
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/2/2009 Posts: 2,841 Points: 8,625 Location: United States, Pacific Northwest
|
nw3bk3y wrote:Sorry, I did my math wrong, J.Q. Adams was 31 in 1798. Still too young to be president by 4 years. Damn you FreeDictionary for not letting me edit my posts!
Yah, and you were right earlier that it was JQA. The source of my quote is there in my posting. The quote is what he said, but he also calls the speaker JQA earlier. I should have put another "sic" in there, I guess.  I don't know whether the omission of the middle initial was accidental and poor editing, or whether he just got tired of using it. I do find it likely that both John Adams' were referred to as "John Adams" by their friends. It is history where we've found the need to distinguish at all times.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/2/2009 Posts: 2,841 Points: 8,625 Location: United States, Pacific Northwest
|
Maggie wrote:Excellent quote. And it sounds EXACTLY like the rhetoric of our present President. Sorry, I cannot recall President Obama saying he should have the power to lock-up U.S. citizens for saying nasty things about the government. He is continuing the President Bush's arguments about holding suspected terrorists (including U.S. citizens!) without proper Miranda information. Is that what you meant?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/27/2009 Posts: 630 Points: 1,828 Location: United States
|
RuthP wrote:Maggie wrote:Excellent quote. And it sounds EXACTLY like the rhetoric of our present President. Sorry, I cannot recall President Obama saying he should have the power to lock-up U.S. citizens for saying nasty things about the government. He is continuing the President Bush's arguments about holding suspected terrorists (including U.S. citizens!) without proper Miranda information. Is that what you meant? I was referring to this part of your quote: Adam’s (sic) response to the people of Westmoreland County – few of whom had voted for Adams – was the classic trick of a would-be democratic tyrant: declaiming to people that they were obliged to submit to opression because the chief executive had been duly elected by other voters. Reference Obama's response shortly after his taking office illustrating a lack of concern for 'bipartisanship' with his now infamous response 'We won. We write the bill". This fits well with your description of the would-be democratic tyrant: "declaiming to people that he/they were obliged to submit to opression because the chief executive had been duly elected by other voters." http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/02/15/obama.gop.stimulus/index.html
"The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program." - Ronald Reagan
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/2/2009 Posts: 2,841 Points: 8,625 Location: United States, Pacific Northwest
|
Sorry Maggie, I still cannot see it.
The article in the link regards the stimulus spending. It states President Obama both spoke with Republicans at the White House and came to the Hill to speak with them. Senator McCain says that the President did not sit down in a room with senators from both parties and facilitate the negotiations. Even had he done nothing, negotiation remains the job of the members of Congress.
This article covers lawmaking by Congress about spending, which is the proper purview of Congress. Much as I dislike the stimulus bill, Congress followed its own procedures. The fact that Congress passed laws which do not please either of us does not mean the laws were illegally imposed upon us, nor does President Obama carry the blame for this.
The President has not asked for power to silence the general citizenry without congressional or judicial restraint. The point of President Adams with the Alien and Sedition act was that the President could lock-up those who spoke against his decisions or policies.
I do find similarities, not exact congruence, between the Alien and Sedition Act and policies regarding those incarcerated at Guantanamo and, possibly, individuals similarly charged in the future. I absolutely believe those provisions are unconstitutional and thus unlawful.
The policies were initially implemented by President Bush's administration, and in that, President Bush was wrong. President Obama is attempting to continue some of these policies, and in this, President Obama is wrong. It is no more right to silence or deny rights to an unpopular minority than to the general citizenry.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/27/2009 Posts: 630 Points: 1,828 Location: United States
|
[quote=RuthP]Sorry Maggie, I still cannot see it.
You see what you want to see. I don't believe that if we had a video tape of this president robbing a quickie store, you'd find a way to discredit the evidence.
But that's ok. There's nothing wrong with passion.
"The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program." - Ronald Reagan
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 4/27/2009 Posts: 140 Points: 404 Location: United States
|
Hupomone wrote: Most political quotes will surely polarize the forum. Personally, I believe today's U.S. government is made by money, for money, and conducted by money. I wouldn't say I'm hostile toward it, but I'm definitely wary of it. It's because I'm not particularyly represented anymore. It's more like I'm managed and manipulated.
I second that! Also, given the evidence of Wall Street, the BP disaster in the Gulf, and the insurance crisis, the evidence is clear that we need some kind of regulation of campaign $$$ going to politicians. Only the truly ignorant or blind would say that the amount of money pouring into Washington does not affect policy or pose a direct threat to our country. I would like to see politicians responding to the "will of the voters" rather than the "will of the money-holders", as Mr. Adams so reverently defended.
“Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll understand.” -- Chinese proverb
|
|
|
Guest |