BETA The Free Dictionary  
Welcome Guest Forum Search | Active Topics | Members | Log In | Register

Skeleton of "Lucy" Discovered (1974) Options
Daemon
Posted: Monday, November 30, 2009 12:00:00 AM
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 3/7/2009
Posts: 1,890
Points: 5,620
Location: Inside Farlex computers
Skeleton of "Lucy" Discovered (1974)

"Lucy," a 3.2 million-year-old female hominid of the species Australopithecus afarensis, was discovered by scientists in Ethiopia's Afar Depression. An unprecedented 40% intact, Lucy was the first fossil hominid to really capture public notice. Although she was 3 feet, 8 inches tall and looked somewhat like a chimpanzee, her bipedal knee structure indicates that she walked upright, like a human. What other human skeletal features did she possess? More...
MichalG
Posted: Monday, November 30, 2009 2:27:05 PM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 3/16/2009
Posts: 1,050
Points: 2,800
Location: United States
I know that a skeleton alleged to be an older human ancestor was found recently. A week or so after the initial findings were announced, I heard the tail end of a news report stating that scientists had been mistaken about the new discovery's link to humans. So, is Lucy still the oldest human ancestor or is the newly found skeleton the oldest?
TYSON
Posted: Monday, November 30, 2009 8:24:42 PM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 4/7/2009
Posts: 542
Points: 1,593
Location: Melbourne, Australia
tHERE HAVE BEEN A FEW OLDER SPECIMINS FOUND SINCE LUCY. I BELIEVE SOME OF THE OLDEST HUMAN REMAINS HAVE BEEN FOUND RIGHT HERE IN AUSTRALIA.
Geeman
Posted: Monday, November 30, 2009 9:47:14 PM

Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 10/2/2009
Posts: 708
Points: 2,135
Location: United States
Is it just me, or is the fact that someone looked at a haphazard collection of brown, dessicated bones and named it "Lucy" a little creepy? I know it's hard to capture the public's imagination, so there's an effort to make these things more friendly, but giving first names to ancient bones is a bit weird.

I like it when they name archeologically important finds after the modern name for the region they are found in, or the circumstances of the discovery. Taung Child or Peking Man. That's the way to name a fossil.

Wikipedia has a good list of hominid fossils, BTW, for those interested in the timeline.
Drew
Posted: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 11:48:37 AM
Rank: Advanced Member

Joined: 3/17/2009
Posts: 930
Points: 2,765
Location: United States
Geeman wrote:
Is it just me, or is the fact that someone looked at a haphazard collection of brown, dessicated bones and named it "Lucy" a little creepy? I know it's hard to capture the public's imagination, so there's an effort to make these things more friendly, but giving first names to ancient bones is a bit weird.

I like it when they name archeologically important finds after the modern name for the region they are found in, or the circumstances of the discovery. Taung Child or Peking Man. That's the way to name a fossil.


You make an interesting observation, Geeman. Apparently, according to the article, "Lucy" was named after the Beatles song "Lucy in the Sky with Diamonds," which had been playing at the camp during the night of the discovery. So at least the naming of the fossil in this case was somewhat organic and not the result of some kind of focus group or something.
Users browsing this topic
Guest


Forum Jump
You cannot post new topics in this forum.
You cannot reply to topics in this forum.
You cannot delete your posts in this forum.
You cannot edit your posts in this forum.
You cannot create polls in this forum.
You cannot vote in polls in this forum.

Main Forum RSS : RSS
Forum Terms and Guidelines. Copyright © 2008-2010 Farlex, Inc. All rights reserved.