|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,098 Points: 9,315 Location: United States
|
Hmmm,
I find myself in the unusual position of defending Herman Cain. Make no mistake, I abhor his political philosophy, to say the least, he will not have my vote next November.
Well, the current smear campaign against him is unethical and cynical and damages American politics. I mean let us be real: no sooner does the man become the front-runner for the GOP nomination that he has one, then two, then three women allege sexual harassment against him. To me, from the outside looking in:
1. This isn't a coincidence. These allegations didnt' surface when he announced his candidacy. They only started to "pop" once he became a serious contender.
2. These allegations are all of them a decade or more old. Much like the Right tried to smear Clinton over a failed land deal that was many years old at the time, why is this suddenly news? Why should we care?
It looks like a smear to me.
This brings up the fiasco of how American Jurisprudence handles Sexual Harassment in general:
1. Someone can make a claim from the shadows, his/her identity protected. Organizations and individuals tend to pay off to keep things quiet rather than have their reputations sullied. This happened in the 1990s with that restaurant group that Cain headed in the 1990s. Paying off isn't the same thing as guilt. It means you want it to be kept quiet. Nothing more. And, those looking for a payout know this and take full advantage of it. They risk nothing.
2. If the accused fights, and the charges are dismissed, their reputation and career are still in ruins. The charges hit the press, the internet, the 24 hour news cycle. They have to walk the "perp walk". They are judged and condemend by public opninion before the trial, if it ever gets that far! The "accusor" risks nothing, even for the shabbiest of charges, and can walk off into the sunset, cloaked in anonymity.
This isn't justice.
It is also why those that deal in political dirty tricks go to this poisoned well again and again and again.
I don't know the cure, I just know that this isn't any way to choose a candidate, and it sure as hell is nothing like a proper way to discover guilt and determine justice!
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 3/20/2009 Posts: 245 Points: 769 Location: United States
|
It's all politics and all the negative things you mention. However, Cain never had any intentions of running for President. He doesn't even have campaign workers strategically placed to further any presidential cause. He's just on a big book tour - selling his books and making arrangements for speaking engagements which means lots of money for him. He isn't knowledgeable enough to be considered a qualified candidate anyway.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,098 Points: 9,315 Location: United States
|
Seeker,
I consider your words well placed, and, a very apt addition to this post. Just how poisoned is the political process that a person enters it to make money. I am certain that Sarah Palin did so last time around. I'm not so sure about Cain. He seems passionate and angry about the recent turn of events.
Et tu, Brutus?
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,546 Points: 4,705 Location: United States
|
Apparently one of the reasons this issue didn't come up earlier is that there's a gag order on the women involved, and Cain's defense of his behavior has been slippery at best... so I'm not convinced this thing is entirely political. The timing of the reports could very well be, but it seems to me that it would be better to wait until he'd secured a nomination for the impact to be fully damaging. So, again, the timing doesn't seem quite right to make this out to be a smear campaign.
Plus, it seems pretty obvious that Cain actually is that kind of stupid.... His public comments make me believe he's got a slippery handle on reality in the first place, and more than his fair of egoism, even for a would-be politician.
It may be a smear campaign, but if it is, then it's not a particularly well organized one. No parade of angry women being interviewed. No lawyers defending them/speaking for them. No litany of details. It just doesn't have all the spice of a real smear campaign.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/30/2010 Posts: 5,711 Points: 17,072 Location: Canada
|
Judging by some of the reports I've read it seems to be elements of his own party that are throwing him under the back of the bus.
Sanity is not statistical
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/20/2011 Posts: 1,297 Points: 3,887 Location: Spain
|
How does it feel to be lonesome? -or is it all about selling smoke?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,098 Points: 9,315 Location: United States
|
excaelis wrote:Judging by some of the reports I've read it seems to be elements of his own party that are throwing him under the back of the bus. Ex, I'd heard that as well. The Cain campaign acutally accused Perry's campaign of complicity, though they quickly backed off that charge. Some of the Republican candidates had a Forum (not sure if it was a full debate) and they avoided the subject entirely. I congratulate them for that. The man has been found guilty of absolutely nothing, yet his career in politics could be smashed by allegations of those that throw bombs from the shadows and risk nothing.
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/15/2011 Posts: 774 Points: 2,093 Location: Earth
|
-- jmacann wrote:How does it feel to be lonesome? -or is it all about selling smoke? Your post seems to indicate that loneliness is something you very much want to experience, jmacann.
Forgiving is Love, Love is For Giving.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/30/2009 Posts: 1,461 Points: 4,240 Location: United States
|
Ex,
I'd heard that as well. The Cain campaign acutally accused Perry's campaign of complicity, though they quickly backed off that charge.
Some of the Republican candidates had a Forum (not sure if it was a full debate) and they avoided the subject entirely. I congratulate them for that. The man has been found guilty of absolutely nothing, yet his career in politics could be smashed by allegations of those that throw bombs from the shadows and risk nothing.[/quote]
I like this HWNN1961!
nowherenothere: I think of some types of alone-ness as a sounds of silence type of situation... and "smoke" always reminds me of fog... silence in the fog... it is so peaceful.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/15/2011 Posts: 774 Points: 2,093 Location: Earth
|
I don't think Herman Cain has much to say other than 999. His economic plan most likely would not benefit many people other than the one percenters, what little of it he has elaborated upon anyway. Nor would it stimulate the economy. Most economists I've spoken with agree. I don't think he's ever been a serious candidate for President. Other than the current scandalous media attention, the highlight of Herman Cain's career is apparently Godfather's Pizza. Does he have any legislative or gubornatorial experience? That's not to be confused with Goober Peas, which is a different form of goobernatorial experience altogether; Goober Peas. RubyMoon wrote: nowherenothere: I think of some types of alone-ness as a sounds of silence type of situation... and "smoke" always reminds me of fog... silence in the fog... it is so peaceful.
Yep, there is a sense of freedom in being alone, and definitely serenity, and peace.
Forgiving is Love, Love is For Giving.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/30/2010 Posts: 5,711 Points: 17,072 Location: Canada
|
L'enfer, c'est les autres.
Sanity is not statistical
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 8/3/2009 Posts: 1,898 Points: 5,718 Location: Columbia, SC, United States
|
Word today is that his poll numbers are dropping. Good to see the Repugs so mixed up.
In the spring, at the end of the day, you should smell like dirt.--Mar Atwood
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/10/2010 Posts: 266 Points: 791 Location: United States
|
boneyfriend wrote:Word today is that his poll numbers are dropping. Good to see the Repugs so mixed up. How soon we forget
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 9/21/2009 Posts: 19,936 Points: 59,817 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Truthseeker wrote:boneyfriend wrote:Word today is that his poll numbers are dropping. Good to see the Repugs so mixed up. How soon we forget Good to see how seriously some folks take the American politics. And good to see how some folks always want to give us good laughs.
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/10/2010 Posts: 266 Points: 791 Location: United States
|
Jyrkkä Jätkä wrote:Truthseeker wrote:boneyfriend wrote:Word today is that his poll numbers are dropping. Good to see the Repugs so mixed up. How soon we forget Good to see how seriously some folks take the American politics. And good to see how some folks always want to give us good laughs. Ah, JJ. So you've changed your mind and wish to share some of your vast insights on American Politics........ or the humor surrounding it. I have great respect for the views of ONE Dane regarding humor: “Humor is something that thrives between man's aspirations and his limitations. There is more logic in humor than in anything else. Because, you see, humor is truth.” Victor Borge
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 4/16/2009 Posts: 809 Points: 2,459 Location: Alaska
|
Now that there are 4 women accusing Cain of sexual harassment, it is reduced to simply a matter of "He said, and She said, and She said, and She said, and She said...."
Could it be that where there is smoke, there is fire?
Personally, the whole GOP goat rope and 3-ring circus going on must have President Obama smiling in his sleep right now.
"Always wash your hands and say your prayers for germs and Jesus are everywhere." -Naomi Judd
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,662 Points: 4,934 Location: Gaeltacht, Ireland
|
Met a lass yesterday on the road to Killarney touting her thigh as sporting fingerprints of Cain. Everyone thought it merry. Off to Singapore for a spell!
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 9/21/2009 Posts: 19,936 Points: 59,817 Location: Helsinki, Finland
|
Truthseeker, did you know that when the Nazis occupied Denmark during World War II, Borge escaped to Finland, and to USA from thereon?
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/10/2010 Posts: 266 Points: 791 Location: United States
|
Jyrkkä Jätkä wrote:Truthseeker, did you know that when the Nazis occupied Denmark during World War II, Borge escaped to Finland, and to USA from thereon?
Yes.
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,098 Points: 9,315 Location: United States
|
A couple observations as this situation unfolds:
1. Anyone else notice how well the news cycle is being used? It would be inefficient to have two or even three of these charges come to light at the same time. Better to release them one at a time, every day or two to keep the story prominent and give the story staying power. It could be happenstance, but, I'm too cynical after watching politics for so long not to at least wonder...
2. I think what is causing Mr. Cain irreparable harm is his poor reaction to the mess. It's a political truism that the charges in a scandal often aren't what get a politician in trouble, it's the denials and the coverups that follow.
Imagine if Clinton came clean right away about Lewinsky, apologized to the nation and got it off his chest. Might have saved us 18 months of agony.
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/30/2010 Posts: 5,711 Points: 17,072 Location: Canada
|
Clinton's problem was that he didn't get it off her chest.
This guy's going to need a pretty good lawyer ; I wonder if any of Tiger's guys are free ?
Sanity is not statistical
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,546 Points: 4,705 Location: United States
|
Well, this whole thing is looking less and less like a setup and more and more like just another psychotically narcissistic power junkie doing what that sort of guy does: act as if he is untouchable and deny, deny, deny.
Does anybody think these allegations are really a surprise to HC? What kind of mindset does it take to run for the highest office in the land knowing that this is in one's background?
Cain would appear to be just another complete jackass whose only true personal asset is a pathological sense of entitlement. A conspiracy? Nope. Ego gone mad.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/10/2010 Posts: 266 Points: 791 Location: United States
|
Geeman wrote:Well, this whole thing is looking less and less like a setup and more and more like just another psychotically narcissistic power junkie doing what that sort of guy does: act as if he is untouchable and deny, deny, deny.
Does anybody think these allegations are really a surprise to HC? What kind of mindset does it take to run for the highest office in the land knowing that this is in one's background?
Cain would appear to be just another complete jackass whose only true personal asset is a pathological sense of entitlement. A conspiracy? Nope. Ego gone mad. Just curious. Did you feel the same way about Bill Clinton?
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,546 Points: 4,705 Location: United States
|
Truthseeker wrote:Just curious. Did you feel the same way about Bill Clinton? Equally curious, would you be asking if Cain weren't a so-called conservative?
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 5/19/2011 Posts: 5 Points: 15 Location: Canada fredericton new brunswick
|
i can only hope herman cain survives this debacle and wins the republican nomination. he is a fresh face , a self made man ,highly educated but at the same time a down to earth everyday man . a phd in mathmatics, a degree in computer science and a civilian balistics weapons expert with the navy and a self made business man, makes hermain cain more than qualified to lead the country. i can only hope and pray that the grace of GOD and the mercy of the LORD JESUS CHRIST, grants the u.s.a. the blessing, that such a man may once again lead the u.s.a. Your country is in great need at a time of great peril, of such a man.
|
|
Rank: Newbie
Joined: 5/19/2011 Posts: 5 Points: 15 Location: Canada fredericton new brunswick
|
rinkrat4u wrote: i can only hope herman cain survives this debacle and wins the republican nomination. he is a fresh face , a self made man ,highly educated but at the same time a down to earth everyday man . a phd in mathmatics, a degree in computer science and a civilian balistics weapons expert with the navy and a self made business man, makes hermain cain more than qualified to lead the country. i can only hope and pray that the grace of GOD and the mercy of the LORD JESUS CHRIST, grants the u.s.a. the blessing, that such a man may once again lead the u.s.a. Your country is in great need at a time of great peril, of such a man.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 9/30/2010 Posts: 158 Points: 460 Location: United States
|
From the nether world of Chicago politics:http://www.humanevents.com/article.php?id=47438
As is often the case when politics meets legal wrangling, we may never know the full story. Howsoever, this is interesting and plausible.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/10/2010 Posts: 266 Points: 791 Location: United States
|
Geeman wrote:Truthseeker wrote:Just curious. Did you feel the same way about Bill Clinton? Equally curious, would you be asking if Cain weren't a so-called conservative? It's not like you to dodge the question. But then........ To answer your question, YES, I'd be asking the question if you had made such an attack on one individual but avoided commentary on another whose transgressions had already gone past 'accusations' to proven misdeeds. You may remember Gary Hart. Though I was never a fan, I always felt he was given a hatchet job, purely for political reasons.
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 4/22/2011 Posts: 1,106 Points: 3,060 Location: Japan
|
Trivia: Gloria SteinemThough she was a staunch supporter of Anita Hill and fierce opponent of Clarence Thomas, believing that Thomas had committed acts of sexual harassment against Ms. Hill, she gave her full support to President Bill Clinton when numerous women came forward to accuse him of sexually assaulting them. Most of her critics believed this was the case because Thomas is a conservative Republican, while Clinton is a Democrat. Steinem herself is a lifelong supporter of the Democratic Party.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,098 Points: 9,315 Location: United States
|
The heart of what annoys me about this is the calculated cynical nature of the "revelations":
This man has been an announced Presidential candidate for months. If this was about anything except cold-blooded political character assasination, then why not come out with it when he announced? Not until he became a serious contender did these accusations come to light.
...makes it rather tough for one to empathize. It looks far too calculated to be the natural outrage of victims.
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,546 Points: 4,705 Location: United States
|
HWNN1961 wrote:The heart of what annoys me about this is the calculated cynical nature of the "revelations":
This man has been an announced Presidential candidate for months. If this was about anything except cold-blooded political character assasination, then why not come out with it when he announced? Not until he became a serious contender did these accusations come to light.
...makes it rather tough for one to empathize. It looks far too calculated to be the natural outrage of victims. Personally, I don't see it. Despite the 24 hour news cycle and even the speed of modern communications it's pretty difficult to dig up decade old settlement cases with a gag order attached to them. The timeline makes me think the information was put out into the public as soon as it had been found and vetted. The impact of such revelations would have been better after the primary because swing voters are more likely to be influenced by such things. Putting this kind of information out at this point may scuttle his bid, but it doesn't look like it. It would be better to wait until the beginning of the next year (about February) for the heating up of the actual election cycle. If this thing had been timed and orchestrated it would have been much better organized and backed. The women involved would have been already prepped and their identities released along with the allegations. More sordid details would have been released first rather than giving Cain the time to get his story out first. If it's a conspiracy then it's a particularly feeble one, especially considering that the machines that exist out there to perform such media attacks are well-funded, highly organized and quite slick. That said, it is the kind of conspiracy that is tailor made for such organizations, and they've certainly picked it up, but even their attention has been lackluster in comparison to such scandals in the past. I don't see any call to reopen investigations. There's no independent council. No state investigations. All the heat appears to be coming from actual facts that contradict his own statements, not a witch hunt. I suspect that's because most people think Cain is something of an empty suit, and his candidacy will be something of an historical blip. Of course, it's possible that that's all part of the conspiracy. The logic might be that they only whip out the big guns when one is necessary and Cain doesn't warrant that much effort. But that's the conspiracy theory version....
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,546 Points: 4,705 Location: United States
|
Truthseeker wrote:Geeman wrote:Truthseeker wrote:Just curious. Did you feel the same way about Bill Clinton? Equally curious, would you be asking if Cain weren't a so-called conservative? It's not like you to dodge the question. But then........ To answer your question, YES, I'd be asking the question if you had made such an attack on one individual but avoided commentary on another whose transgressions had already gone past 'accusations' to proven misdeeds. You may remember Gary Hart. Though I was never a fan, I always felt he was given a hatchet job, purely for political reasons. Well, first off, let me say that I oppose psychotic narcisists be they on the left or on the right. Secondly, I haven't avoided any commentary about any other politician as you suggest. This thread is about Cain. It's in the title at the top of the page. Had this been a general thread about politicians who can't keep their pants on then it would be logical to bring up Clinton. Since it's not, doing so smacks more of obfuscation than clarification. "He's not so bad, the other side has guys like him too." Clinton was pathologically incapable of keeping his zipper closed. My view is that what happens consensually between people is a matter of personal, not public importance, and I can't help but note that the accusations against Clinton that rose to sexual harassment did all seem to come from sources that had an awful lot of political money behind them, which appears to be lacking in Cain's case. That may prove not to be true, but time will tell. So, in short, my reaction to Clinton differed from my reaction to Cain. Furthermore, my assessment of Clinton differs from that of Cain in that though I think he was a failed President on many levels, Clinton did actually manage to oversee the greatest period of economic expansion in the history of the planet. Cain's version of economic planning is 9-9-9, which is to taxation and franchise what Monopoly is to real estate. So, my attitude towards Clinton differs from Cain in at least as much as the recognition of Clinton as a CAPABLE pathological narcissist where Cain is, at best, a sort of befuddled ninny. If there were an equation to express disdain it would go something like this: Transgression(s) - Achievement / Capabilities = Disdain. Cain scores very, very badly on that equation. He's well into negative numbers. Clinton merely scores low.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/10/2010 Posts: 266 Points: 791 Location: United States
|
Geeman wrote:\ Cain scores very, very badly on that equation. He's well into negative numbers. Clinton merely scores low. So.......... Would you agree, then, that there is NOTHING a strict fiscal Capitalist Conservative could say that would make him/her an acceptable candidate? THAT'S the basic difference between what liberals think and what the majority of the American people think. See congressional elections, 2010, as well as the recent transformations of various state legislatures across the country.
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,546 Points: 4,705 Location: United States
|
Truthseeker wrote:So.......... Would you agree, then, that there is NOTHING a strict fiscal Capitalist Conservative could say that would make him/her an acceptable candidate?
THAT'S the basic difference between what liberals think and what the majority of the American people think. See congressional elections, 2010, as well as the recent transformations of various state legislatures across the country. Is that what you think is going on with Cain? It's not that he's got wandering hands and more ego than sense, but that his 9-9-9 policy is the sort of economics that people find unacceptable? I'm sure Cain would describe himself as a strict fiscal capitalist conservative (mostly because the term has the word "conservative" in it) but I see very little evidence to support that claim if for no other reason than he seems to have very little grasp of the Federal budgeting process. I just don't see a conspiracy here, nor some underground political agenda on one side or the other. There's no core driving force that Cain exemplifies. He barely--if at all--seems to understand the platforms of the party under whose banner he's running. He doesn't rise to the level to inspire the left to much more than rolling their eyes, and they don't have to go to any more effort to discredit him than keep the cameras rolling. This guy was a trainwreck from the beginning. Perception is just getting a little closer to reality.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 6/10/2010 Posts: 266 Points: 791 Location: United States
|
Geeman wrote: There's no core driving force that Cain exemplifies. He barely--if at all--seems to understand the platforms of the party under whose banner he's running. He doesn't rise to the level to inspire the left to much more than rolling their eyes, and they don't have to go to any more effort to discredit him than keep the cameras rolling. This guy was a trainwreck from the beginning. Perception is just getting a little closer to reality. Ah...... but the goal is NOT to inspire the left. That's been one of the problems all along. If one tries to make 'liberal' overtures in hopes of getting some of the leftist vote, it's a losing proposition. Who on the left would support someone who only 'plays at' a socialist philosophy? Cain isn't doing that. And it's a good thing. As for understanding the platform of his own party, have you looked at the waning support that Our Socialist President is getting from HIS party lately? It seems he's forgotten their platform as well. Right now, Obama is losing by significant numbers to a blank Republican opponent. IF any 'debates' are held with open questions, I don't see any way that Obama can provide answers that will be satisfactory for the majority of the American public, whether their other choice is Cain, Gingrich, or - heaven forbid - Romney.
Everyone thinks of changing the world, but no one thinks of changing himself. Leo Tolstoy
|
|
|
Guest |