|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,542 Points: 4,693 Location: United States
|
Truthseeker wrote:Geeman wrote: There's no core driving force that Cain exemplifies. He barely--if at all--seems to understand the platforms of the party under whose banner he's running. He doesn't rise to the level to inspire the left to much more than rolling their eyes, and they don't have to go to any more effort to discredit him than keep the cameras rolling. This guy was a trainwreck from the beginning. Perception is just getting a little closer to reality. Ah...... but the goal is NOT to inspire the left. That's been one of the problems all along. If one tries to make 'liberal' overtures in hopes of getting some of the leftist vote, it's a losing proposition. Who on the left would support someone who only 'plays at' a socialist philosophy? Cain isn't doing that. And it's a good thing. As for understanding the platform of his own party, have you looked at the waning support that Our Socialist President is getting from HIS party lately? It seems he's forgotten their platform as well. Right now, Obama is losing by significant numbers to a blank Republican opponent. IF any 'debates' are held with open questions, I don't see any way that Obama can provide answers that will be satisfactory for the majority of the American public, whether their other choice is Cain, Gingrich, or - heaven forbid - Romney. There's a big difference between the behavior of a candidate in a primary and that of someone serving in office. After they are elected all politicians wind up becoming more centrist by default. However, I'd still argue that Obama is much more closely connected to his party's ideals than Cain is to the Republican values. At this point Cain is supposed to be pandering to his base, so his lack of comprehension of even basic Republican values doesn't jibe. I haven't been following him that much because I don't think he'll amount to much more than a sort of cautionary tale in the next 5 years and then he'll be forgotten, but what I have seen of him makes me wonder how Republicans sit in a room with the guy. He has nothing in common with any of them philosophically other than his apparently shameless desire for self-promotion and self-interest. He's laughably pathetic as a candidate. I can only speculate that he's got some sort of backroom negotiation savvy or--I suspect--he's got friendly enemies in the right places. That is, people owe him. That's the only intelligent explanation for his prominance. There is, of course, another explanation. The Republicans are playing the race card. They've been tragically inept at that in the past at issues involving race, and Cain appears to be a continuation of that self-same process. Of course, that's not a particularly powerful card to play these days, but I don't think the current leadership of the Republican party have caught on to that fact either. A vote for a blank Republican poster isn't really an endorsement of Republican values. Rather, it's a simple call for more rapid change combined with the age old political adage: "It's the economy, stupid." That's going to be Obama's only real problem in 2012, no matter who the Republicans put up against him.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,079 Points: 9,258 Location: United States
|
Mr, Cain, though his own words, has committed political suicide. I stand by my revulsion at people willing to hold their "secrets" aside for more than a decade, then feign the raw meat of "victim" when the "crime' happened years ago.
But, really, the barcuda lawyer and her bevy of character assasins could have saved the effort.
Herman Cain had no position on Libya.
I'll say that again...he had no position on Libya..
An issue that any ordinary citizen would be familiar with simply by reading a newspaper, an ap on her phone, or watching the TV for a few minutes. It was all over the media since late last winter.
How on God's earth can the man be so mis-informed...be the very soul of ignorance, and yet think he is qualified to be the President of the most powerful nation on earth?
The smear squad could have saved the effort.
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,542 Points: 4,693 Location: United States
|
...and now Ginger White.
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 1/18/2011 Posts: 1,437 Points: 3,470 Location: United States
|
And while we're at it, let's not overlook the Clarence Thomas' US Supreme Court Senate confirmation hearings of 1991. That brouhaha also involved an Afro-American seeking high public office whose reputation and fitness for office were attacked by possibly politically motivated accusations of sexual harassment. Thomas (whose politics I detest) survived the gauntlet. Will Cain?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,662 Points: 4,934 Location: Gaeltacht, Ireland
|
Accusations true or not, we can see an obvious pattern of approach by politician and media.
Off to Singapore for a spell!
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 7/6/2010 Posts: 1,214 Points: 3,601 Location: United States
|
Two pages of wondering and no one thought of how Gingrich went after Bill Clinton all the while he was cheating? Hmmmm!
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/27/2009 Posts: 629 Points: 1,825 Location: United States
|
Wanderer wrote:Two pages of wondering and no one thought of how Gingrich went after Bill Clinton all the while he was cheating? Hmmmm! Personally I don't care who boffs whom. That's been going on since we evolved as a species and it will continue for as long as our form exists. The list of U.S. Presidents who had affairs while in office is almost as long as the list of presidents. HOWEVER - Bill Clinton lied to a grand jury about his infamous history, which denied Paula Jones her right to due process in court. His sin included a felony against another U.S. citizen.
"The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program." - Ronald Reagan
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/20/2011 Posts: 1,297 Points: 3,887 Location: Spain
|
Have all other answers been always satisfactory?
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 12/28/2009 Posts: 2,466 Points: 7,414 Location: the city by the bay
|
Someone please tell me why he has to ask his wife? Makes no sense to me. I would think he would ask his advisors, supporters or and contributors.
Unless she is the one who wears the pants in the family or is perhaps learning a/the truth?????
peace out, >^,,^< The poor object to being governed badly, whilst the rich object to being governed at all. G.K. Chesterton
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,662 Points: 4,934 Location: Gaeltacht, Ireland
|
The assassination referred to may be at hand.
Off to Singapore for a spell!
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,542 Points: 4,693 Location: United States
|
kitten wrote:Someone please tell me why he has to ask his wife? Makes no sense to me. I would think he would ask his advisors, supporters or and contributors.
Unless she is the one who wears the pants in the family or is perhaps learning a/the truth?????  You mean, why does he have to ask his wife about dropping out? It's just that namby-pamby way politicians are expected to behave these days. Of course he doesn't care what she actually thinks. He's been cheating on her right and left for years.... All he really needs to know is whether she's going to go for a big, public divorce or not. That said, I think she does wear the pants now, at least insofar as that she could turn the conversation to his lack of character at any moment by calling the press and announcing that she's filing for divorce. There's no gag order on her.
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 12/28/2009 Posts: 2,466 Points: 7,414 Location: the city by the bay
|
Geeman wrote:kitten wrote:Someone please tell me why he has to ask his wife? Makes no sense to me. I would think he would ask his advisers, supporters or and contributors.
Unless she is the one who wears the pants in the family or is perhaps learning a/the truth?????  You mean, why does he have to ask his wife about dropping out? It's just that namby-pamby way politicians are expected to behave these days. Of course he doesn't care what she actually thinks. He's been cheating on her right and left for years.... All he really needs to know is whether she's going to go for a big, public divorce or not. That said, I think she does wear the pants now, at least insofar as that she could turn the conversation to his lack of character at any moment by calling the press and announcing that she's filing for divorce. There's no gag order on her. Truth be told, the comment in bold was tongue in cheek as I believe the first line I wrote is how he should go, but that is my opinion.
I have listened to the women who has alleged she had a 13 no 14??? year on/off relationship with Mr. Cain. She has kept no papers, receipts and I don't remember if she mentioned gifts. BUT he has given her money, and NO it was not in exchange for sexual favours. She does have recent text??? or telephone messages??? from him, which have yet to be made public.
I have read the comments above and have noticed several adulters/philanders mentioned.
I shall say, I truly did not believe President Clinton would be or was so stupid to carry on like that in the White House. Having said that he was NOT the first President to do so. Presidents of both parties have had mistresses. It was well known by the media, but the gentleman's code/good ol' boys club didn't pay it any mind. And in my mind it really didn't come to the fore or under scrutiny until it was pointed out to the public how our government and our leaders had been lying to us regarding wars and break-ins and the like. It then it seems that the Office of the President and clearly the President himself was put under the microscope by the news media. No more "wink, wink, nudge, nudge."
I also believe that out of all these people, John Edwards, was and is the worst. And if he did use campaign funds to hide, provide, and keep his mistress and child he needs to go to jail and loose his attorney's license. He was worse than Gary Hart who dared the news media to follow him and in my honest opinion he is much worse than President Clinton.
Bottom line is people who run for office are human and they shouldn't be put on a pedestal unless they try their best to do good for all.
The sexual peccadilloes will come out. and anyone running for office should know this. If they do know this and still continue to run for office, expect it, own up to it, deal with it in a timely manner, and show the proper respect for your spouse and step aside. Oh, and don't have her/him stand beside you when you do decide to step aside, that is so demeaning to the injured party.
But these are only my opinions.
And finally the above is all for naught as Mr. Cain has just dropped out of the race.
peace out, >^,,^< The poor object to being governed badly, whilst the rich object to being governed at all. G.K. Chesterton
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 7/6/2010 Posts: 1,214 Points: 3,601 Location: United States
|
Cain must have smeared himself (or was he smearing her?). Kitten, you are right that we can't expect people to be more than human. It is hard not to enjoy someone's downfall when they have showed over and over that they have no compassion. He and all the GOP have the belief they hold the moral high ground. If you lay down a really hard law for someone else don't be surprised when the same measure is meted to you. I was just thinking about George McGovern. I hope he is healing from his fall. But, just think how different the country might have been if he had been elected instead of Nixon. The presidency fell from our esteem because of him and we are still suffering from that disrespect within and without.
peace out
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/27/2009 Posts: 629 Points: 1,825 Location: United States
|
Wanderer wrote:Cain must have smeared himself (or was he smearing her?). Kitten, you are right that we can't expect people to be more than human. It is hard not to enjoy someone's downfall when they have showed over and over that they have no compassion. He and all the GOP have the belief they hold the moral high ground. If you lay down a really hard law for someone else don't be surprised when the same measure is meted to you. I was just thinking about George McGovern. I hope he is healing from his fall. But, just think how different the country might have been if he had been elected instead of Nixon. The presidency fell from our esteem because of him and we are still suffering from that disrespect within and without.
peace out Peace in. There's a HUGE difference in political philosophy that goes to the basics: large vs smaller government, more or less government control. If Nixon were running TODAY he's be a MUCH better choice than the Socialist/Marxist that presently resides in the White House. It matters not whether either of them have had affairs with women. It matters most if they have an ongoing affair with known communists and Marxists. (See Obama advisers)
"The nearest thing to eternal life we will ever see on this earth is a government program." - Ronald Reagan
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/13/2010 Posts: 3,079 Points: 9,258 Location: United States
|
Hopefully Mr. Cain is the first of several dominoes to fall. There are two people with the intellect and the experience to be President among the gaggle of pretenders:
Romney and Gingrich. Personally, of the two, I'd prefer Newt. Some time ago, Drew started a thread about the Republican field of Presidential Candidates, and at that time Newt was a distinct long-shot.
It would be a relief indeed to have two intelligent people argue their positions coherently. There is a chance of that outcome in an Obama V. Gingrich campaign.
This isn't to take anything away from Romney, he's got the ability too. Just my preference.
"Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless, and do no wrong". (Knight's Oath, Kingdom of Heaven)
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 10/2/2009 Posts: 1,542 Points: 4,693 Location: United States
|
HWNN1961 wrote:Hopefully Mr. Cain is the first of several dominoes to fall. There are two people with the intellect and the experience to be President among the gaggle of pretenders:
Romney and Gingrich. Personally, of the two, I'd prefer Newt. Some time ago, Drew started a thread about the Republican field of Presidential Candidates, and at that time Newt was a distinct long-shot.
It would be a relief indeed to have two intelligent people argue their positions coherently. There is a chance of that outcome in an Obama V. Gingrich campaign.
This isn't to take anything away from Romney, he's got the ability too. Just my preference. Honestly, I think it's sad that either Romney or Gingrich are serious candidates for PotUS. Once upon a time, the Republican party was made up of serious intellectual and philosophical minds. People that could appear on the cover of The National Review with no sense of irony (or just a hint....) These days Gingrich is considered an elder statesman, and Romney is... well, the lesser of two weasels? I don't know.... What happened to the actual brains behind the bank accounts? The current batch of private school Brahman piss-poor protoplasmic inbred MBA C student flunkies is just pathetic. My dream is that the ghost of William F. Buckley would appear like Marley's ghost before some Republican candidate and announce that he will be visited that night by the spirits of Conservatism past, present and future. Will he learn the lesson of conservatism or be damned to the endless gibbering Hell of the neo-(really crypto-)con and tea party media masturbation? He'll wake to find it's not too late to really embrace the concepts of libertarian social values and true fiscal conservative (as in conservation) budgeting. In the fat goose economic prosperity that would follow, crippled children would be able to live in a just and free society--as God and the Founding Fathers intended. Can't you hear little Timmy utter those immortal words: "And a limited government, one and all."
|
|
 Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 12/22/2010 Posts: 1,662 Points: 4,934 Location: Gaeltacht, Ireland
|
Your contest of the person challenging President O'Bama seems to be a very old argument. It reminds me of the Roundheads vs. the Cavaliers of old. But this topic may belong elsewhere.
Off to Singapore for a spell!
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Joined: 2/20/2011 Posts: 1,297 Points: 3,887 Location: Spain
|
As old as the hills.
Yes, it does.
|
|
|
Guest |